Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Osmo Labs Pbc

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
2
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (33%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (67%)
No statute on record1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
33% of docket
1
Information Tech
33% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
33% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
COONS, LOGAN DOUGLAS 1 100.0% +0.0%
BRAHMACHARI, MANDRITA 1 76.5% +29.8%
AUGER, NOAH ANDREW 1 34.8% +37.7%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18561610 CALIBRATING AN ELECTRONIC CHEMICAL SENSOR TO GENERATE AN EMBEDDING IN AN EMBEDDING SPACE COONS, LOGAN DOUGLAS 12d

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17429192 Systems and Methods for Predicting the Olfactory Properties of Molecules Using Machine Learning AUGER, NOAH ANDREW 128d overdue
18036707 MACHINE-LEARNED MODELS FOR SENSORY PROPERTY PREDICTION BRAHMACHARI, MANDRITA 3d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2857 1
2144 1
1687 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18561610 CALIBRATING AN ELECTRONIC CHEMICAL SENSOR TO GENERATE AN EMBEDDING IN AN EMBEDDING SPACE COONS, LOGAN DOUGLAS 2857 §103 Non-Final OA 12d Pending Nov 16, 2023
18036707 MACHINE-LEARNED MODELS FOR SENSORY PROPERTY PREDICTION BRAHMACHARI, MANDRITA 2144 §103 Non-Final OA 3d overdue Pending May 12, 2023
17429192 Systems and Methods for Predicting the Olfactory Properties of Molecules Using Machine Learning AUGER, NOAH ANDREW 1687 Other Final Rejection 128d overdue Pending Aug 06, 2021

Managing Osmo Labs Pbc's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month