Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Oticon Medical A/S

Technology areas: Communications • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Oticon Medical A/S is managing 4 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are distributed among 4 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units. The busiest examiner is FISCHER, MARK L, who is responsible for 1 pending action. This spread across 3 distinct art units indicates a level of technical diversity in their pending applications. Because each of the 4 pending office actions is assigned to a different examiner, the company must manage multiple sets of examiner expectations and prosecution styles simultaneously.

The presence of 3 distinct art units suggests that the company's medical device innovations are being reviewed by several specialized technical groups at the USPTO. This distribution means that the prosecution risk is spread across different administrative units, rather than being concentrated in a single art unit. For practitioners, this requires a strategy that can adapt to the specific precedents and examination standards of the 3 distinct art units involved. With the workload split among 4 distinct examiners, the company's immediate patenting success is not dependent on any single individual, but rather on the outcomes of independent review processes. This lack of examiner concentration can lead to varying timelines for the pending office actions currently in the pipeline.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (75%)
1
Medium (25%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (75%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
25% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
75% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
FISCHER, MARK L 1 68.0% +28.0%
JOHNSON, NICOLE F 1 87.4% +7.0%
DIETZ, NOE ROBERT 1 0.0% +0.0%
HONRATH, MARC D 1 74.5% +31.7%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18606512 IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICE COMPRISING A WIRELESS TRANSCUTANEOUS LINK JOHNSON, NICOLE F 3d overdue

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17965484 ELECTROMAGNETIC VIBRATOR FOR GENERATING A VIBRATION IN ORDER TO TRANSMIT SOUND THROUGH A BONE OF A SKULL OF A USER TO AN EAR OF THE USER AND A BONE ANCHORED HEARING DEVICE DIETZ, NOE ROBERT 23d
18898165 BONE ANCHORED HEARING IMPLANT DEVICE, HEARING DEVICE SYSTEM AND SIGNAL PROCESSING METHOD FISCHER, MARK L —
17670079 MEDICAL DEVICE HONRATH, MARC D —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18898165 BONE ANCHORED HEARING IMPLANT DEVICE, HEARING DEVICE SYSTEM AND SIGNAL PROCESSING METHOD FISCHER, MARK L —
17670079 MEDICAL DEVICE HONRATH, MARC D —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3791 2
2692 1
3796 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18898165 BONE ANCHORED HEARING IMPLANT DEVICE, HEARING DEVICE SYSTEM AND SIGNAL PROCESSING METHOD FISCHER, MARK L 2692 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 26, 2024
18606512 IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICE COMPRISING A WIRELESS TRANSCUTANEOUS LINK JOHNSON, NICOLE F 3796 §103 Final Rejection 3d overdue Pending Mar 15, 2024
17965484 ELECTROMAGNETIC VIBRATOR FOR GENERATING A VIBRATION IN ORDER TO TRANSMIT SOUND THROUGH A BONE OF A SKULL OF A USER TO AN EAR OF THE USER AND A BONE ANCHORED HEARING DEVICE DIETZ, NOE ROBERT 3791 §103§112 Final Rejection 23d Pending Oct 13, 2022
17670079 MEDICAL DEVICE HONRATH, MARC D 3791 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 11, 2022

Managing Oticon Medical A/S's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month