Technology areas: Networking & Security • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Ottopia Technologies Ltd. has 2 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. The matters are assigned to 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, giving each action a separate prosecution context. Counsel should maintain consistent treatment of the portfolio’s transportation and mechanical concepts while tailoring analysis to each examiner’s record.
KLEINMAN, LAIL A is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. The examiner handles one of the current actions, so the docket is distributed between examiner relationships. Separate response preparation is appropriate, with cross-matter comparison used to identify genuine technical overlap rather than to assume identical examination results.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KLEINMAN, LAIL A | 1 | 70.5% | +16.2% |
| TANG, KAREN C | 1 | 70.5% | +24.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18818050 | OPERATING SYSTEM AND PLATFORM | KLEINMAN, LAIL A | 17d overdue |
| 18664769 | TECHNIQUES FOR ENHANCED CONGESTION CONTROL USING NETWORK FEEDBACK SIMULATION | TANG, KAREN C | 1d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3668 | 1 |
| 2447 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18818050 | OPERATING SYSTEM AND PLATFORM | KLEINMAN, LAIL A | 3668 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 17d overdue | Pending | Aug 28, 2024 |
| 18664769 | TECHNIQUES FOR ENHANCED CONGESTION CONTROL USING NETWORK FEEDBACK SIMULATION | TANG, KAREN C | 2447 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 1d overdue | Pending | May 15, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialOttopia Technologies Ltd. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Lail A Kleinman has the most, with 1 of Ottopia Technologies Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
