Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Overail S R L is currently managing 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, showing a singular focus for the company's active patent matters. This concentration suggests that the company is currently pursuing a specific advancement in the Chemistry & Materials field. The involvement of 1 distinct art unit indicates that the review is being conducted by a specialized technical group. This concentration simplifies the tracking of pending matters but increases the impact of any examiner's decision-making style.
PAMELA HL WEISS is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 busiest examiner pending action under her review. This individual is the only examiner currently assigned to the company's pending cases. The 1 pending office action represents the entirety of the company's active interaction with the patent office. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner, the prosecution strategy can be specifically tailored to her examination style. This focus on 1 busiest examiner pending action and 1 distinct art unit simplifies the administrative management of the active applications.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WEISS, PAMELA HL | 1 | 54.9% | +45.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18553781 | CONCRETE COMPOSITION FOR RAILWAY FOUNDATIONS | WEISS, PAMELA HL | 10d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1732 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18553781 | CONCRETE COMPOSITION FOR RAILWAY FOUNDATIONS | WEISS, PAMELA HL | 1732 | §103 | Final Rejection | 10d overdue | Pending | Oct 03, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial