Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Oxylabs Uab

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Networking & Security

8 pending office actions • 7 art units • 8 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Oxylabs Uab has 9 pending office actions in Computing & Software. The matters are assigned to 9 distinct examiners and 8 distinct art units, indicating that nearly every pending matter is proceeding through a separate examiner relationship.

SERRAO, RANODHI N is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. The distribution suggests that prosecution planning should be organized by individual case and art unit, with limited opportunity to rely on a dominant examiner-specific pattern. Counsel may want to maintain a centralized record of claim language and response positions so that related software issues are handled consistently across the dispersed docket.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (38%)
5
Medium (62%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only2 (25%)
§101 + other1 (12%)
§103 only3 (38%)
§102 only2 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
8
Information Tech
100% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SERRAO, RANODHI N 1 87.3% +15.2%
LEE, GIL H 1 83.4% +28.0%
STEVENS, ROBERT 1 81.4% +11.9%
HARPER, ELIYAH STONE 1 73.5% +11.5%
MOSER, BRUCE M 1 84.2% +20.1%
BARKER, TODD L 1 75.5% +23.4%
ALLEN, NICHOLAS E 1 75.6% +14.6%
OSMAN, RAMY M 1 78.9% -9.2%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19193451 SELECTING MANAGED PROXY IP DEVICES BY GEOGRAPHICAL COORDINATES THEREOF SERRAO, RANODHI N —
19098268 METHODS AND SYSTEMS TO MAINTAIN MULTIPLE PERSISTENT CHANNELS BETWEEN PROXY SERVERS LEE, GIL H —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18619453 ADVANCED DATA COLLECTION BLOCK IDENTIFICATION ALLEN, NICHOLAS E 35d overdue
19075551 GENERATING A PATH TO A DOCUMENT ELEMENT USING MACHINE LEARNING STEVENS, ROBERT —
18732041 SCRAPE TIME CALCULATOR MOSER, BRUCE M —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18619453 ADVANCED DATA COLLECTION BLOCK IDENTIFICATION ALLEN, NICHOLAS E 35d overdue
18673840 SELECTING AN EXIT-PROXY BY TCP/UDP PORT AT THE INGRESS-PROXY BARKER, TODD L 22d overdue
19193451 SELECTING MANAGED PROXY IP DEVICES BY GEOGRAPHICAL COORDINATES THEREOF SERRAO, RANODHI N —
19098268 METHODS AND SYSTEMS TO MAINTAIN MULTIPLE PERSISTENT CHANNELS BETWEEN PROXY SERVERS LEE, GIL H —
19075551 GENERATING A PATH TO A DOCUMENT ELEMENT USING MACHINE LEARNING STEVENS, ROBERT —
18933751 Utilizing Database Management and Throttling During Proxy Web Scraping HARPER, ELIYAH STONE —
18732041 SCRAPE TIME CALCULATOR MOSER, BRUCE M —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2154 2
2447 1
2446 1
2164 1
2166 1
2449 1
2457 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19193451 SELECTING MANAGED PROXY IP DEVICES BY GEOGRAPHICAL COORDINATES THEREOF SERRAO, RANODHI N 2447 §102Other Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 29, 2025
19098268 METHODS AND SYSTEMS TO MAINTAIN MULTIPLE PERSISTENT CHANNELS BETWEEN PROXY SERVERS LEE, GIL H 2446 §102Other Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 02, 2025
19075551 GENERATING A PATH TO A DOCUMENT ELEMENT USING MACHINE LEARNING STEVENS, ROBERT 2164 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 10, 2025
18933751 Utilizing Database Management and Throttling During Proxy Web Scraping HARPER, ELIYAH STONE 2166 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 31, 2024
18732041 SCRAPE TIME CALCULATOR MOSER, BRUCE M 2154 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 03, 2024
18673840 SELECTING AN EXIT-PROXY BY TCP/UDP PORT AT THE INGRESS-PROXY BARKER, TODD L 2449 §103 Non-Final OA 22d overdue Pending May 24, 2024
18619453 ADVANCED DATA COLLECTION BLOCK IDENTIFICATION ALLEN, NICHOLAS E 2154 §101§103 Final Rejection 35d overdue Pending Mar 28, 2024
18431584 TRAFFIC SERVICE THREADS FOR LARGE POOLS OF NETWORK ADDRESSES OSMAN, RAMY M 2457 §103 Final Rejection 5d overdue Pending Feb 02, 2024

Managing Oxylabs Uab's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Oxylabs Uab have?

Oxylabs Uab has 8 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 7 art units and 8 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Oxylabs Uab applications?

Ranodhi N Serrao has the most, with 1 of Oxylabs Uab's pending office actions.

What technology area are Oxylabs Uab's patent applications in?

Mostly Networking & Security (USPTO Tech Center 2400), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month