Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Pacmar Technologies LLC has a focused patent prosecution presence in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The company currently faces 1 pending office action, which is the sole active matter in its prosecution pipeline. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, ensuring that the company's current intellectual property efforts are evaluated by a single set of eyes at the patent office.
The activity is localized within 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a specific technical focus for the pending application. GHORISHI, SEYED BEHROOZ is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently managing 1 pending office action. Since this 1 action is the only one pending for the company, the examiner's specific feedback and requirements will be the deciding factor for the portfolio's near-term success. This concentrated structure allows for a very focused legal strategy but lacks the risk distribution found in larger, more diverse portfolios.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAYES, JOVON E | 1 | 84.5% | +9.9% |
| GHORISHI, SEYED BEHROOZ | 1 | 68.8% | +44.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19073151 | Offboard Launch and Recovery System and Method for Unmanned Platforms | HAYES, JOVON E | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18633307 | DUAL EDGE BINDER MACHINE AND OPERATING METHOD | GHORISHI, SEYED BEHROOZ | 22d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3615 | 1 |
| 1748 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19073151 | Offboard Launch and Recovery System and Method for Unmanned Platforms | HAYES, JOVON E | 3615 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 07, 2025 |
| 18633307 | DUAL EDGE BINDER MACHINE AND OPERATING METHOD | GHORISHI, SEYED BEHROOZ | 1748 | §103 | Final Rejection | 22d overdue | Pending | Apr 11, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial