5 pending office actions • 4 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (20%) |
| §103 only | 4 (80%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZARKA, DAVID PETER | 1 | 82.4% | +12.9% |
| KASSIM, HAFIZ A | 1 | 44.2% | +53.4% |
| LEMIEUX, JESSICA | 1 | 65.6% | +23.9% |
| RUHL, DENNIS WILLIAM | 1 | 26.2% | +22.8% |
| ZENG, WENWEI | 1 | — | — |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18950511 | Action Recommendations for Operational Issues | ZARKA, DAVID PETER | 2d overdue |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18428323 | ADJUSTING INCIDENT PRIORITY | LEMIEUX, JESSICA | 66d overdue |
| 18475845 | Smart Incident Status Updates | RUHL, DENNIS WILLIAM | 15d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18428323 | ADJUSTING INCIDENT PRIORITY | LEMIEUX, JESSICA | 66d overdue |
| 18950511 | Action Recommendations for Operational Issues | ZARKA, DAVID PETER | 2d overdue |
| 18475845 | Smart Incident Status Updates | RUHL, DENNIS WILLIAM | 15d |
| 18800634 | MODIFYING AN EVENT NOTIFICATION CONFIGURATION BASED ON INCIDENT RESOLUTION DATA | KASSIM, HAFIZ A | 42d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3626 | 2 |
| 2449 | 1 |
| 3623 | 1 |
| 2146 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18950511 | Action Recommendations for Operational Issues | ZARKA, DAVID PETER | 2449 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 2d overdue | Pending | Nov 18, 2024 |
| 18800634 | MODIFYING AN EVENT NOTIFICATION CONFIGURATION BASED ON INCIDENT RESOLUTION DATA | KASSIM, HAFIZ A | 3623 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 42d | Pending | Aug 12, 2024 |
| 18428323 | ADJUSTING INCIDENT PRIORITY | LEMIEUX, JESSICA | 3626 | §101 | Final Rejection | 66d overdue | Pending | Jan 31, 2024 |
| 18475845 | Smart Incident Status Updates | RUHL, DENNIS WILLIAM | 3626 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 15d | Pending | Sep 27, 2023 |
| 18160755 | Alert Grouping For Noise Reduction | ZENG, WENWEI | 2146 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 51d overdue | Pending | Jan 27, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial