Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
5 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 5 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KNACKSTEDT, JACOB BENEDICT | 2 | 87.5% | +16.7% |
| CHOLLETI, RAGHAVENDER NMN | 1 | 60.0% | +45.1% |
| CHEN, QING | 1 | 79.9% | +52.8% |
| WON, MICHAEL YOUNG | 1 | 79.8% | +29.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18783523 | Autonomous Cyber-Security Investigation and Response using Graphs | KNACKSTEDT, JACOB BENEDICT | 49d |
| 18661626 | Automated Discovery of Behavioral Threat Protection Rules | KNACKSTEDT, JACOB BENEDICT | 75d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18475266 | Cloud computer credential theft detection | WON, MICHAEL YOUNG | 16d overdue |
| 18779134 | Detection of malicious code by forcing execution violation | CHOLLETI, RAGHAVENDER NMN | 21d |
| 18502013 | SOURCE CODE CORRECTION SYSTEM USING VALIDATION RULES | CHEN, QING | 33d |
| 18783523 | Autonomous Cyber-Security Investigation and Response using Graphs | KNACKSTEDT, JACOB BENEDICT | 49d |
| 18661626 | Automated Discovery of Behavioral Threat Protection Rules | KNACKSTEDT, JACOB BENEDICT | 75d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2408 | 2 |
| 2492 | 1 |
| 2191 | 1 |
| 2443 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18783523 | Autonomous Cyber-Security Investigation and Response using Graphs | KNACKSTEDT, JACOB BENEDICT | 2408 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 49d | Pending | Jul 25, 2024 |
| 18779134 | Detection of malicious code by forcing execution violation | CHOLLETI, RAGHAVENDER NMN | 2492 | §103 | Final Rejection | 21d | Pending | Jul 22, 2024 |
| 18661626 | Automated Discovery of Behavioral Threat Protection Rules | KNACKSTEDT, JACOB BENEDICT | 2408 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 75d | Pending | May 12, 2024 |
| 18502013 | SOURCE CODE CORRECTION SYSTEM USING VALIDATION RULES | CHEN, QING | 2191 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 33d | Pending | Nov 05, 2023 |
| 18475266 | Cloud computer credential theft detection | WON, MICHAEL YOUNG | 2443 | §103 | Final Rejection | 16d overdue | Pending | Sep 27, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial