Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Pandia GmbH is currently engaged in the patent prosecution process within the Computing & Software technology area. The company has 1 pending office action, which is assigned to 1 distinct examiner. This indicates a very focused prosecution profile where all current activity is concentrated on a single application or family. The matter is being reviewed within 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a specific technical focus for the company's intellectual property. Practitioners should observe that this concentration limits the variety of examiner feedback available.
The busiest examiner for Pandia GmbH is CHOI, MICHAEL W, who is handling 1 pending office action. Since the total count of pending office actions is 1, this examiner is the only person currently evaluating the company's claims. This alignment of 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit means that the company's immediate success in the Computing & Software area depends on the specific requirements of this examiner. Practitioners should note that with only 1 pending office action, there is no broader data from other examiners or art units to inform the current prosecution strategy for this portfolio.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHOI, MICHAEL W | 1 | 77.3% | +29.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18276324 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MACHINE MONITORING, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR MACHINE MONITORING | CHOI, MICHAEL W | 26d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18276324 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MACHINE MONITORING, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR MACHINE MONITORING | CHOI, MICHAEL W | 26d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2116 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18276324 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MACHINE MONITORING, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR MACHINE MONITORING | CHOI, MICHAEL W | 2116 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | 26d | Pending | Aug 08, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial