Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Pandorum Technologies Private Limited currently maintains 1 pending office action within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The prosecution of this action involves 1 distinct examiner and is located in 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a very specific and concentrated area of activity for the company's patent portfolio at this time.
ANOOP KUMAR SINGH is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, overseeing 1 pending action. As there is only 1 pending office action in total, this examiner is responsible for the entire active workload. The placement of this action within 1 distinct art unit in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector highlights the specific technical focus of the current examination.
For practitioners, the 1 pending office action is the sole focus of the company's current patent office engagement. The involvement of 1 distinct examiner, ANOOP KUMAR SINGH, provides a single point of contact for the prosecution. Monitoring the 1 pending action is essential for tracking the progress of the company's intellectual property in this technology area.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SINGH, ANOOP KUMAR | 1 | 43.0% | +67.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18437857 | METHODS FOR CULTURING MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS, COMPOSITIONS AND IMPLEMENTATIONS THEREOF | SINGH, ANOOP KUMAR | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18437857 | METHODS FOR CULTURING MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS, COMPOSITIONS AND IMPLEMENTATIONS THEREOF | SINGH, ANOOP KUMAR | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1632 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18437857 | METHODS FOR CULTURING MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS, COMPOSITIONS AND IMPLEMENTATIONS THEREOF | SINGH, ANOOP KUMAR | 1632 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 09, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial