Technology area: Networking & Security
12 pending office actions • 10 art units • 12 examiners • 0 of 12 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 9 patents granted in the last 365 days
Panpsy Technologies LLC is managing 12 pending office actions in the Networking & Security technology area. These 12 actions are assigned to 12 distinct examiners, creating a one-to-one ratio between pending matters and the officials reviewing them. The portfolio spans 10 distinct art units, indicating that the networking and security technologies being patented fall into several different sub-specialties at the USPTO. This distribution requires the applicant to manage 12 separate prosecution timelines simultaneously.
The busiest examiner is RUBIN, BLAKE J, who has 1 pending office action. Since there are 12 distinct examiners for the 12 pending office actions, the workload is perfectly distributed across the assigned staff. Practitioners should be prepared to manage 12 separate prosecution timelines across the 10 distinct art units involved in these filings. The involvement of 12 distinct examiners means that the company must be prepared for 12 unique approaches to prior art and obviousness rejections.
Because the 12 pending office actions are spread across 10 distinct art units, practitioners must monitor for potential conflicts in prosecution across different technical divisions. This broad distribution underscores the complexity of the company's current engagement with the USPTO. The 12 pending office actions represent a significant workload that requires careful coordination to ensure consistent claim language across the Networking & Security portfolio. The lack of concentration under a single examiner means that each case requires a unique strategy.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 5 (42%) |
| §102 only | 1 (8%) |
| Double-patenting only | 2 (17%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 4 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| RUBIN, BLAKE J | 1 | 76.1% | -3.5% |
| CATTUNGAL, AJAY P | 1 | 89.1% | +6.6% |
| CUNNINGHAM, KEVIN M | 1 | 72.0% | +11.0% |
| ACOLATSE, KODZOVI | 1 | 83.9% | +20.6% |
| ELMEJJARMI, ABDELILLAH | 1 | 81.3% | +25.6% |
| PHUNKULH, BOB A | 1 | 89.4% | +9.4% |
| HAMPTON, TARELL A | 1 | 86.2% | +10.2% |
| HAN, CLEMENCE S | 1 | 90.9% | +5.2% |
| SCHEIBEL, ROBERT C | 1 | 80.7% | +15.0% |
| OLALEYE, OLADIRAN GIDEON | 1 | 75.0% | +15.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18202976 | Network Energy Saving | SCHEIBEL, ROBERT C | 14d |
| 18892346 | Scheduling of a Primary Cell from a Secondary Cell | CATTUNGAL, AJAY P | — |
| 18233043 | Signaling of Side Control Information for a Network Controlled Repeater | HAN, CLEMENCE S | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18442483 | Anchor Cell for Network Energy Saving | PHUNKULH, BOB A | 18d overdue |
| 18653354 | URLLC in Unlicensed Bands | ACOLATSE, KODZOVI | — |
| 18626285 | Wireless Communications Using a Network Controlled Repeater | ELMEJJARMI, ABDELILLAH | — |
| 18383219 | Uplink Control Information for Unused Transmission Occasion Indication | HAMPTON, TARELL A | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18138466 | Enhanced Timing Advance Indication | OLALEYE, OLADIRAN GIDEON | 23d overdue |
| 18202976 | Network Energy Saving | SCHEIBEL, ROBERT C | 14d |
| 18796357 | Scheduling in Carrier Aggregation | CUNNINGHAM, KEVIN M | — |
| 18653354 | URLLC in Unlicensed Bands | ACOLATSE, KODZOVI | — |
| 18626285 | Wireless Communications Using a Network Controlled Repeater | ELMEJJARMI, ABDELILLAH | — |
| 18383219 | Uplink Control Information for Unused Transmission Occasion Indication | HAMPTON, TARELL A | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2467 | 2 |
| 2472 | 2 |
| 2457 | 1 |
| 2461 | 1 |
| 2462 | 1 |
| 2412 | 1 |
| 2476 | 1 |
| 2414 | 1 |
| 2411 | 1 |
| 2416 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18929525 | Unused Transmission Occasion Indication | RUBIN, BLAKE J | 2457 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 28, 2024 |
| 18892346 | Scheduling of a Primary Cell from a Secondary Cell | CATTUNGAL, AJAY P | 2467 | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 21, 2024 |
| 18796357 | Scheduling in Carrier Aggregation | CUNNINGHAM, KEVIN M | 2461 | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 07, 2024 |
| 18653354 | URLLC in Unlicensed Bands | ACOLATSE, KODZOVI | 2472 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 02, 2024 |
| 18626285 | Wireless Communications Using a Network Controlled Repeater | ELMEJJARMI, ABDELILLAH | 2462 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Apr 03, 2024 |
| 18442483 | Anchor Cell for Network Energy Saving | PHUNKULH, BOB A | 2412 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 18d overdue | Pending | Feb 15, 2024 |
| 18383219 | Uplink Control Information for Unused Transmission Occasion Indication | HAMPTON, TARELL A | 2476 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Oct 24, 2023 |
| 18233043 | Signaling of Side Control Information for a Network Controlled Repeater | HAN, CLEMENCE S | 2414 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Aug 11, 2023 |
| 18202976 | Network Energy Saving | SCHEIBEL, ROBERT C | 2467 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 14d | Pending | May 29, 2023 |
| 18138466 | Enhanced Timing Advance Indication | OLALEYE, OLADIRAN GIDEON | 2472 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 23d overdue | Pending | Apr 24, 2023 |
| 18109323 | Random Access Process Enhancement | NGUYEN, CHUONG M | 2411 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 28d | Pending | Feb 14, 2023 |
| 17977077 | Transport Block over Multiple Slots | NGO, ANGELIE THIEN THAN | 2416 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 31, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialPanpsy Technologies LLC has 12 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 10 art units and 12 examiners.
Blake J Rubin has the most, with 1 of Panpsy Technologies LLC's pending office actions.
Mostly Networking & Security (USPTO Tech Center 2400), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
