Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Paradigm LLC is currently dealing with 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner and is situated within 1 distinct art unit. This focus means that the company's current prosecution efforts are entirely dependent on the decisions of a single official. The examiner in charge of this matter is BOSWELL, BETH V, who holds 1 pending office action. Because there are no other active matters, the outcome of this 1 pending office action will define the company's current progress in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field.
The concentration of 1 pending office action under 1 distinct examiner in 1 distinct art unit simplifies the management of the portfolio. Practitioners can dedicate their efforts to understanding the specific requirements of BOSWELL, BETH V within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector. The stability of having 1 distinct art unit involved ensures a consistent administrative framework for the application. Practitioners should focus on the specific precedents and preferences of this 1 distinct examiner to move the application toward allowance, as their individual perspective is the primary factor in the current prosecution cycle. This targeted approach is necessary for securing the company's intellectual property.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BOSWELL, BETH V | 1 | 9.9% | -2.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18409656 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVED BUILDER PROJECT MANAGEMENT | BOSWELL, BETH V | 63d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3625 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18409656 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVED BUILDER PROJECT MANAGEMENT | BOSWELL, BETH V | 3625 | §103 | Final Rejection | 63d | Pending | Jan 10, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial