Technology areas: Computing & Software • Networking & Security • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 18 patents granted in the last 365 days
Paramount Bed Co., Ltd. has 4 pending office actions in Networking & Security. Each matter is assigned to a different examiner and a different art unit, producing a fully distributed examination profile. The portfolio therefore calls for centralized docket control alongside separate technical assessments, particularly where claim language may interact differently with the art handled by each unit.
CZEKAJ, DAVID J is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. The examiner handles one of the four identified matters, while the other files are assigned elsewhere. Counsel can use a common disclosure and terminology framework, but should build each response around the particular record, art unit practice, and claim objections in that file.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (25%) |
| §103 only | 1 (25%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CZEKAJ, DAVID J | 1 | 49.8% | -7.8% |
| SCHIMPF, TARA E | 1 | 78.9% | +7.4% |
| ROBERTS, ANNA L | 1 | 55.7% | +39.8% |
| HUANG, MIRANDA M | 1 | 60.5% | +52.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18533824 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD | ROBERTS, ANNA L | 18d overdue |
| 18694003 | EXCREMENT ANALYSIS APPARATUS, EXCREMENT ANALYSIS METHOD, PRE-COLONOSCOPY STATE CONFIRMATION APPARATUS, STATE CONFIRMATION SYSTEM, STATE CONFIRMATION METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM | CZEKAJ, DAVID J | 8d overdue |
| 18537040 | ELECTRIC FURNITURE | SCHIMPF, TARA E | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18533824 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD | ROBERTS, ANNA L | 18d overdue |
| 18203285 | BED SYSTEM | HUANG, MIRANDA M | 5d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2487 | 1 |
| 3676 | 1 |
| 3791 | 1 |
| 2124 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18694003 | EXCREMENT ANALYSIS APPARATUS, EXCREMENT ANALYSIS METHOD, PRE-COLONOSCOPY STATE CONFIRMATION APPARATUS, STATE CONFIRMATION SYSTEM, STATE CONFIRMATION METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM | CZEKAJ, DAVID J | 2487 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | 8d overdue | Pending | Mar 21, 2024 |
| 18537040 | ELECTRIC FURNITURE | SCHIMPF, TARA E | 3676 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 12, 2023 |
| 18533824 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD | ROBERTS, ANNA L | 3791 | §101§102 | Non-Final OA | 18d overdue | Pending | Dec 08, 2023 |
| 18203285 | BED SYSTEM | HUANG, MIRANDA M | 2124 | §103 | Final Rejection | 5d | Pending | May 30, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialParamount Bed Co., Ltd. has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 4 art units and 4 examiners.
David J Czekaj has the most, with 1 of Paramount Bed Co., Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Networking & Security (USPTO Tech Center 2400), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
