Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026

Paramount Bed Co., Ltd.

7 pending office actions • 5 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 20 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
1
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (57%)
3
Medium (43%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other3 (43%)
§103 only2 (29%)
§102 only1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (14%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
2
Information Tech
29% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
57% of docket
1
Business / Other
14% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TOKARCZYK, CHRISTOPHER B 1 43.3% +23.3%
KOLOSOWSKI-GAGER, KATHERINE 1 26.3% +30.7%
CZEKAJ, DAVID J 1 49.2% -8.9%
ROBERTS, ANNA L 1 55.7% +40.1%
DOUGHERTY, SEAN PATRICK 1 74.9% +15.2%
HUANG, MIRANDA M 1 60.5% +54.0%
BARTLEY, KENNETH 1 36.0% +28.8%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18694003 EXCREMENT ANALYSIS APPARATUS, EXCREMENT ANALYSIS METHOD, PRE-COLONOSCOPY STATE CONFIRMATION APPARATUS, STATE CONFIRMATION SYSTEM, STATE CONFIRMATION METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM CZEKAJ, DAVID J 8d overdue
18034757 INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD BARTLEY, KENNETH 12d
19228528 INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD TOKARCZYK, CHRISTOPHER B
19037807 INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD KOLOSOWSKI-GAGER, KATHERINE

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18533824 INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD ROBERTS, ANNA L 18d overdue
18203285 BED SYSTEM HUANG, MIRANDA M 5d
18034757 INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD BARTLEY, KENNETH 12d
18561264 INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD DOUGHERTY, SEAN PATRICK 26d
19228528 INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD TOKARCZYK, CHRISTOPHER B
19037807 INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD KOLOSOWSKI-GAGER, KATHERINE

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3791 2
3687 1
2487 1
2124 1
3684 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19228528 INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD TOKARCZYK, CHRISTOPHER B §101DP Non-Final OA Pending Jun 04, 2025
19037807 INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD KOLOSOWSKI-GAGER, KATHERINE 3687 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Jan 27, 2025
18694003 EXCREMENT ANALYSIS APPARATUS, EXCREMENT ANALYSIS METHOD, PRE-COLONOSCOPY STATE CONFIRMATION APPARATUS, STATE CONFIRMATION SYSTEM, STATE CONFIRMATION METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM CZEKAJ, DAVID J 2487 §102§103 Non-Final OA 8d overdue Pending Mar 21, 2024
18533824 INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD ROBERTS, ANNA L 3791 §102 Final Rejection 18d overdue Pending Dec 08, 2023
18561264 INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD DOUGHERTY, SEAN PATRICK 3791 §103 Final Rejection 26d Pending Nov 15, 2023
18203285 BED SYSTEM HUANG, MIRANDA M 2124 §103 Final Rejection 5d Pending May 30, 2023
18034757 INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD BARTLEY, KENNETH 3684 §101§112 Final Rejection 12d Pending May 01, 2023

Managing Paramount Bed Co., Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month