Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Paree Group OY maintains a company patent portfolio in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The portfolio currently has 1 pending office action. This single action represents the current active workload for the company's patent prosecution.
The prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. Because the 1 pending office action is assigned to a single examiner, the company's current efforts are concentrated in one administrative area. This allows for a focused response to the specific technical issues raised by the patent office within that 1 distinct art unit.
CATINA, MICHAEL ANTHONY is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This examiner is the only official currently reviewing the company's pending matters. Success in the prosecution will be determined by the specific examination criteria and style of this busiest examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CATINA, MICHAEL ANTHONY | 1 | 31.5% | +30.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18025981 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MEASURING BLOOD IN LIQUID | CATINA, MICHAEL ANTHONY | 35d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3791 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18025981 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MEASURING BLOOD IN LIQUID | CATINA, MICHAEL ANTHONY | 3791 | §103 | Final Rejection | 35d | Pending | Mar 13, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial