Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Passenger Inc.

Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Passenger Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. The portfolio's active matters are handled by 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This reflects a consolidated prosecution effort within a specific technical domain. A portfolio with 1 pending action and 1 distinct examiner allows for a direct and uncomplicated prosecution strategy, as there are no competing examiner preferences to manage.

SULTAN U. CHOWDHURY is the busiest examiner, currently managing the 1 busiest examiner pending action. With only 1 pending office action across the 1 distinct art unit, the company's current prosecution success is tied directly to the resolution of this single matter. This focused approach simplifies the management of the company's active filings. Practitioners should prioritize understanding the specific requirements of this 1 examiner to efficiently advance the company's interests in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
100% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHOWDHURY, SULTAN U. 1 89.6% +6.4%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18645390 Immersive Optical Projection System CHOWDHURY, SULTAN U. 68d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2882 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18645390 Immersive Optical Projection System CHOWDHURY, SULTAN U. 2882 §103 Non-Final OA 68d Pending Apr 25, 2024

Managing Passenger Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month