Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Pattern Inc.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Pattern Inc. operates a patent portfolio in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The company currently has 6 pending office actions. This volume shows a level of active prosecution at the patent office.

These 6 pending office actions are handled by 5 distinct examiners. These examiners are distributed across 4 distinct art units. This indicates that the company's filings are being reviewed by a small group of examiners within the transportation and e-commerce sectors, with some overlap in technical divisions.

BAGGOT, BREFFNI is the busiest examiner for Pattern Inc., with 2 busiest examiner pending office actions. These 2 actions account for a portion of the total 6 pending office actions. The remaining actions are distributed among the other 4 distinct examiners.

The use of 4 distinct art units suggests that the portfolio covers several different technical aspects of mechanical systems. Practitioners should be aware that the 6 pending office actions are subject to the varying review styles of 5 distinct examiners.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
2
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (75%)
1
Medium (25%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only2 (50%)
§101 + other1 (25%)
§103 only1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WEINER, ARIELLE E 1 43.4% +53.6%
ANSARI, AZAM A 1 47.3% +47.9%
KONERU, SUJAY 1 58.1% +37.3%
BAGGOT, BREFFNI 1 35.7% +25.8%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19073685 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REAL-TIME BIDDING ANSARI, AZAM A 18d overdue
19203410 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONDUCTING DIGITAL MARKETPLACE LISTING COMPARISONS WEINER, ARIELLE E —
18984310 AUTOMATED LURKER ADVERTISING SYSTEM BAGGOT, BREFFNI —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19073685 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REAL-TIME BIDDING ANSARI, AZAM A 18d overdue
19036651 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED CONTENT CREATION KONERU, SUJAY 56d
19203410 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONDUCTING DIGITAL MARKETPLACE LISTING COMPARISONS WEINER, ARIELLE E —
18984310 AUTOMATED LURKER ADVERTISING SYSTEM BAGGOT, BREFFNI —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3621 2
3689 1
3624 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19203410 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONDUCTING DIGITAL MARKETPLACE LISTING COMPARISONS WEINER, ARIELLE E 3689 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending May 09, 2025
19073685 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REAL-TIME BIDDING ANSARI, AZAM A 3621 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA 18d overdue Pending Mar 07, 2025
19036651 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED CONTENT CREATION KONERU, SUJAY 3624 §103 Non-Final OA 56d Pending Jan 24, 2025
18984310 AUTOMATED LURKER ADVERTISING SYSTEM BAGGOT, BREFFNI 3621 §101Other Final Rejection — Pending Dec 17, 2024

Managing Pattern Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Pattern Inc. have?

Pattern Inc. has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Pattern Inc. applications?

Arielle E Weiner has the most, with 1 of Pattern Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Pattern Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month