Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
7 pending office actions • 3 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Pattern Inc. currently has 7 pending office actions within its company patent portfolio. These actions are situated in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The portfolio's prosecution is spread across 3 distinct art units. This concentration suggests that the company's mechanical and e-commerce innovations are being reviewed by a small, specialized group of technical units.
There are 6 distinct examiners involved in these 7 pending office actions. BAGGOT, BREFFNI is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently managing 2 pending office actions. This examiner is the only one handling more than a single matter, as the remaining actions are distributed among the other examiners. The presence of 6 examiners for 7 actions indicates a relatively distributed workload. Practitioners should note that BAGGOT, BREFFNI holds a larger share of the portfolio's active matters compared to the other examiners, making this examiner's tendencies particularly relevant to the company's overall prosecution success.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 2 (29%) |
| §101 + other | 3 (43%) |
| §103 only | 2 (29%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAGGOT, BREFFNI | 2 | 35.3% | +25.8% |
| MORRIS, JOHN J | 1 | 61.4% | +20.4% |
| WEINER, ARIELLE E | 1 | 43.6% | +53.3% |
| ZEENDER, FLORIAN M | 1 | 21.6% | +18.4% |
| ANSARI, AZAM A | 1 | 47.4% | +47.8% |
| KONERU, SUJAY | 1 | 58.2% | +37.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19073685 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REAL-TIME BIDDING | ANSARI, AZAM A | 18d overdue |
| 18591797 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TO GENERATE MARKETPLACE LISTINGS | BAGGOT, BREFFNI | 30d |
| 19203410 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONDUCTING DIGITAL MARKETPLACE LISTING COMPARISONS | WEINER, ARIELLE E | — |
| 19189909 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AND DYNAMICALLY APPLYING DIGITAL REPRESENTATIONS OF ITEMS WITHIN A WAREHOUSE ENVIRONMENT | ZEENDER, FLORIAN M | — |
| 18984310 | AUTOMATED LURKER ADVERTISING SYSTEM | BAGGOT, BREFFNI | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19073685 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REAL-TIME BIDDING | ANSARI, AZAM A | 18d overdue |
| 19203348 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXECUTING DIGITAL MARKETPLACE SYNDICATION REQUESTS | MORRIS, JOHN J | 5d overdue |
| 18591797 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TO GENERATE MARKETPLACE LISTINGS | BAGGOT, BREFFNI | 30d |
| 19036651 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED CONTENT CREATION | KONERU, SUJAY | 56d |
| 19203410 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONDUCTING DIGITAL MARKETPLACE LISTING COMPARISONS | WEINER, ARIELLE E | — |
| 19189909 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AND DYNAMICALLY APPLYING DIGITAL REPRESENTATIONS OF ITEMS WITHIN A WAREHOUSE ENVIRONMENT | ZEENDER, FLORIAN M | — |
| 18984310 | AUTOMATED LURKER ADVERTISING SYSTEM | BAGGOT, BREFFNI | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3621 | 3 |
| 2152 | 1 |
| 3624 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19203348 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXECUTING DIGITAL MARKETPLACE SYNDICATION REQUESTS | MORRIS, JOHN J | 2152 | §103 | Final Rejection | 5d overdue | Pending | May 09, 2025 |
| 19203410 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONDUCTING DIGITAL MARKETPLACE LISTING COMPARISONS | WEINER, ARIELLE E | — | §101 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 09, 2025 |
| 19189909 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AND DYNAMICALLY APPLYING DIGITAL REPRESENTATIONS OF ITEMS WITHIN A WAREHOUSE ENVIRONMENT | ZEENDER, FLORIAN M | — | §101§102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 25, 2025 |
| 19073685 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REAL-TIME BIDDING | ANSARI, AZAM A | 3621 | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | 18d overdue | Pending | Mar 07, 2025 |
| 19036651 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED CONTENT CREATION | KONERU, SUJAY | 3624 | §103 | Final Rejection | 56d | Pending | Jan 24, 2025 |
| 18984310 | AUTOMATED LURKER ADVERTISING SYSTEM | BAGGOT, BREFFNI | 3621 | §101Other | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 17, 2024 |
| 18591797 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TO GENERATE MARKETPLACE LISTINGS | BAGGOT, BREFFNI | 3621 | §101DP | Non-Final OA | 30d | Pending | Feb 29, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial