Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
5 pending office actions • 4 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 2 (40%) |
| §103 only | 3 (60%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MORRIS, JOHN J | 1 | 60.9% | +19.7% |
| ANSARI, AZAM A | 1 | 47.6% | +49.6% |
| KONERU, SUJAY | 1 | 58.3% | +37.1% |
| BAGGOT, BREFFNI | 1 | 34.9% | +23.6% |
| BOYCE, ANDRE D | 1 | 36.0% | +19.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17730869 | PRODUCT EVALUATION SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USE | BOYCE, ANDRE D | 72d overdue |
| 18591797 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TO GENERATE MARKETPLACE LISTINGS | BAGGOT, BREFFNI | 30d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17730869 | PRODUCT EVALUATION SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USE | BOYCE, ANDRE D | 72d overdue |
| 19073685 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REAL-TIME BIDDING | ANSARI, AZAM A | 18d overdue |
| 19203348 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXECUTING DIGITAL MARKETPLACE SYNDICATION REQUESTS | MORRIS, JOHN J | 5d overdue |
| 18591797 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TO GENERATE MARKETPLACE LISTINGS | BAGGOT, BREFFNI | 30d |
| 19036651 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED CONTENT CREATION | KONERU, SUJAY | 56d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3621 | 2 |
| 2152 | 1 |
| 3624 | 1 |
| 3623 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19203348 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXECUTING DIGITAL MARKETPLACE SYNDICATION REQUESTS | MORRIS, JOHN J | 2152 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 5d overdue | Pending | May 09, 2025 |
| 19073685 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REAL-TIME BIDDING | ANSARI, AZAM A | 3621 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 18d overdue | Pending | Mar 07, 2025 |
| 19036651 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED CONTENT CREATION | KONERU, SUJAY | 3624 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 56d | Pending | Jan 24, 2025 |
| 18591797 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TO GENERATE MARKETPLACE LISTINGS | BAGGOT, BREFFNI | 3621 | §101 | Final Rejection | 30d | Pending | Feb 29, 2024 |
| 17730869 | PRODUCT EVALUATION SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USE | BOYCE, ANDRE D | 3623 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 72d overdue | Pending | Apr 27, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial