Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Patty LLC operates in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The company has 1 pending office action currently in progress with 1 distinct examiner. This indicates that the company's current prosecution efforts are concentrated on a single active matter, providing a very specific point of engagement with the patent office.
This activity is situated within 1 distinct art unit. The busiest examiner for the portfolio is ANDERSON, SCOTT C, who is managing the 1 pending office action currently on record. With only 1 distinct examiner and 1 pending action, the prosecution landscape for the company is currently very narrow and specific. The 1 pending office action assigned to this examiner represents the entirety of the company's active filings.
For a practitioner, this concentration within 1 distinct art unit and under 1 distinct examiner simplifies the legal strategy. There is no need to manage multiple examiner styles or technical standards across different groups. The outcome for Patty LLC in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area depends entirely on the interaction regarding this single pending matter.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANDERSON, SCOTT C | 1 | 58.6% | +31.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19068680 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PRESENTING ONE OR MORE PRODUCTS TO A USER VIA A VIRTUAL ASSISTANT | ANDERSON, SCOTT C | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19068680 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PRESENTING ONE OR MORE PRODUCTS TO A USER VIA A VIRTUAL ASSISTANT | ANDERSON, SCOTT C | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3694 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19068680 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PRESENTING ONE OR MORE PRODUCTS TO A USER VIA A VIRTUAL ASSISTANT | ANDERSON, SCOTT C | 3694 | §101Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 03, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial