Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Paulee Cleantec Ltd. is currently addressing 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This matter is being processed in 1 distinct art unit, which suggests a concentrated technical focus for the company's current patent applications. The prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner, allowing for a direct and consistent dialogue between the applicant and the patent office.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is SMITH, JENNIFER A, who is currently managing 1 pending office action. As this examiner handles the only active office action for the company, the immediate trajectory of the portfolio is tied to this specific individual's examination patterns. The data shows that 1 distinct art unit is involved, indicating that there are no conflicting procedural requirements from different USPTO sections at this time.
For a practitioner, the presence of 1 distinct examiner like SMITH, JENNIFER A simplifies the task of monitoring examiner-specific statistics and preferences. The strategy for the 1 pending office action can be highly focused on the specific requirements of the Chemistry & Materials field. This streamlined structure reduces the overhead typically associated with managing a more diverse array of pending matters.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SMITH, JENNIFER A | 1 | 61.0% | +26.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17640892 | ORGANOMINERAL FERTILIZER AND PROCESS THEREFOR | SMITH, JENNIFER A | 77d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1731 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17640892 | ORGANOMINERAL FERTILIZER AND PROCESS THEREFOR | SMITH, JENNIFER A | 1731 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 77d overdue | Pending | Mar 07, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial