Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Payscale currently has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is assigned to a distinct examiner, SALMAN, AVIA ABDULSATTAR. The action is located within a distinct art unit. SALMAN, AVIA ABDULSATTAR is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. This data reflects a very focused and limited current prosecution profile for the company.
The concentration of the entire active portfolio under a single examiner and art unit simplifies the prosecution strategy. Practitioners can focus exclusively on the specific requirements and historical tendencies of the assigned examiner. Because there is only a single art unit involved, the company's current interactions with the patent office are highly centralized. This focus within the transportation and e-commerce sector suggests a targeted approach to their intellectual property development. The involvement of a single examiner ensures a consistent set of feedback applies to the company's current work.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SALMAN, AVIA ABDULSATTAR | 1 | 48.8% | +42.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18904977 | System and Method for Automated Acquisition and Integration of Survey Data | SALMAN, AVIA ABDULSATTAR | 35d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18904977 | System and Method for Automated Acquisition and Integration of Survey Data | SALMAN, AVIA ABDULSATTAR | 35d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3627 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18904977 | System and Method for Automated Acquisition and Integration of Survey Data | SALMAN, AVIA ABDULSATTAR | 3627 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | 35d overdue | Pending | Oct 02, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial