Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Peak Power Inc.

Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Peak Power Inc. is currently navigating 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 2 pending office actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners, indicating that the current workload is split between two different individuals. The applicant must address the unique requirements of each examiner to advance these 2 pending office actions.

The prosecution activity is spread across 2 distinct art units, which points to a variety of technical focuses within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field. LAKHANI, ANDREW C is identified as the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This represents 1 of the 2 pending office actions for the company.

A practitioner should note that with 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, there is no central point of concentration for the 2 pending office actions. Each case requires an independent approach tailored to the specific examiner, including LAKHANI, ANDREW C. Managing these 2 pending office actions involves tracking progress through two separate administrative channels at the patent office.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (50%)
§101 + other1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
50% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LAKHANI, ANDREW C 1 23.4% +29.1%
ONDRASIK, JOHN PAUL 1 52.6% +44.9%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18812421 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS CONTROL BASED ON MARGINAL EMISSION FACTOR DATA AND ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS LAKHANI, ANDREW C —
18470997 ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING DETECTION SYSTEMS AND METHODS ONDRASIK, JOHN PAUL —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18812421 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS CONTROL BASED ON MARGINAL EMISSION FACTOR DATA AND ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS LAKHANI, ANDREW C —
18470997 ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING DETECTION SYSTEMS AND METHODS ONDRASIK, JOHN PAUL —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3629 1
2859 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18812421 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS CONTROL BASED ON MARGINAL EMISSION FACTOR DATA AND ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS LAKHANI, ANDREW C 3629 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 22, 2024
18470997 ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING DETECTION SYSTEMS AND METHODS ONDRASIK, JOHN PAUL 2859 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 20, 2023

Managing Peak Power Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Peak Power Inc. have?

Peak Power Inc. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Peak Power Inc. applications?

Andrew C Lakhani has the most, with 1 of Peak Power Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Peak Power Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month