Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Pelatro Pte. Ltd. manages 3 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. Each of these 3 pending office actions is being handled by a different individual, as there are 3 distinct examiners involved. The prosecution activity is spread across 2 distinct art units, indicating that the technical subject matter is not confined to a single specialized group within the patent office.
The busiest examiner, WOODWORTH, II, ALLAN J, is currently managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. This is consistent with the overall distribution where each of the 3 distinct examiners manages a single matter. With 3 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, the company's small pending portfolio is reviewed by a unique set of individuals for each matter. This lack of examiner overlap means that the company must address different examination styles even for a small number of applications. Practitioners should expect a variety of feedback, as no single examiner holds a majority of the pending workload. The distribution across 2 distinct art units further emphasizes the variety of the technical subject matter under review.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (50%) |
| §112 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WOODWORTH, II, ALLAN J | 1 | 38.7% | +40.0% |
| OBAID, HAMZEH M | 1 | 38.3% | +22.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18941335 | System And Method For The Quantitative Measurement and Reduction Of Marketing Entropy Using Geometric Methods And Heuristics | OBAID, HAMZEH M | 5d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18941335 | System And Method For The Quantitative Measurement and Reduction Of Marketing Entropy Using Geometric Methods And Heuristics | OBAID, HAMZEH M | 5d |
| 19375760 | System and Method for Optical-Wave Modeling of Customer Behavior in Marketing Ecosystems | WOODWORTH, II, ALLAN J | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3622 | 1 |
| 3624 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19375760 | System and Method for Optical-Wave Modeling of Customer Behavior in Marketing Ecosystems | WOODWORTH, II, ALLAN J | 3622 | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 31, 2025 |
| 18941335 | System And Method For The Quantitative Measurement and Reduction Of Marketing Entropy Using Geometric Methods And Heuristics | OBAID, HAMZEH M | 3624 | §101§102 | Final Rejection | 5d | Pending | Nov 08, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial