Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Penthera Partners Inc. currently has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This case is assigned to a distinct examiner, NGUYEN, THUY N. The portfolio is concentrated in a distinct art unit, which reflects the technical focus for the company's current patenting activities. Because NGUYEN, THUY N is the busiest examiner with 1 pending action, the entirety of the company's active prosecution is handled by this individual.
For a practitioner, this means the outcome of the current portfolio depends on the tendencies of a specific examiner. The concentration in the art unit suggests that the prosecution strategy is specialized. The presence of the pending office action indicates the current level of active engagement with the patent office. Practitioners should prioritize understanding the specific examination history of the named individual to anticipate potential hurdles. Since there is only the active case, any delay or rejection affects the overall portfolio status. The focus on Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems suggests that the technical group is specialized in that field. This approach requires a response strategy tailored to the specific examiner involved.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NGUYEN, THUY N | 1 | 57.5% | +24.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18889773 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AD INSERTION | NGUYEN, THUY N | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18889773 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AD INSERTION | NGUYEN, THUY N | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3622 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18889773 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AD INSERTION | NGUYEN, THUY N | 3622 | §101 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Sep 19, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial