Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Perceptive Lighting Inc. manages a company patent portfolio within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The portfolio currently shows 1 pending office action. This workload is distributed across 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The concentration of the portfolio into a single art unit suggests a narrow technical focus within the medical and mechanical fields for the current filings.
The busiest examiner identified in the data is ARYANPOUR, MITRA. This examiner is currently handling 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because the total number of pending office actions is 1, this single examiner manages the entirety of the company's active prosecution before the patent office. For a practitioner, this situation requires a highly specific approach tailored to the individual examiner's past behavior and requirements. The lack of multiple examiners or art units simplifies the coordination of prosecution but increases the impact of a single examiner's perspective on the overall portfolio. Strategy should be focused on the specific tendencies of the identified examiner to ensure consistent results across the portfolio.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARYANPOUR, MITRA | 1 | 56.0% | +33.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19218843 | BILLIARD LIGHT | ARYANPOUR, MITRA | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19218843 | BILLIARD LIGHT | ARYANPOUR, MITRA | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3711 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19218843 | BILLIARD LIGHT | ARYANPOUR, MITRA | 3711 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 27, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialPerceptive Lighting Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Mitra Aryanpour has the most, with 1 of Perceptive Lighting Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
