Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Perfect Ip LLC operates a company patent portfolio focused on the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The portfolio currently has 1 pending office action, reflecting a targeted and specific engagement with the patent office. This level of 1 pending office action suggests that the company is focusing its resources on securing a particular innovation within its field.
The prosecution environment for Perfect Ip LLC is concentrated, featuring 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This indicates that the company's intellectual property is being evaluated within a single technical silo at the patent office. For the practitioner, this means that the prosecution strategy is simplified, as it only needs to address the requirements of the 1 distinct art unit and the 1 distinct examiner.
DIETRICH, JOSEPH M is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently handling 1 pending office action. As the only 1 examiner involved in the company's current prosecution, Dietrich's individual approach to the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering field will be the primary factor in the outcome. The busiest examiner pending count of 1 confirms that this is the only active point of contact between Perfect Ip LLC and the patent office, allowing for a focused legal strategy.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DIETRICH, JOSEPH M | 1 | 80.8% | +8.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19051079 | UV ABSORBER ALTERATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | DIETRICH, JOSEPH M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3796 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19051079 | UV ABSORBER ALTERATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | DIETRICH, JOSEPH M | 3796 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 11, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial