Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Peri GmbH holds 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The current workload is distributed across 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This suggests a targeted prosecution effort for the company's intellectual property in this specific field. The lack of diversity in examiners indicates that the applicant's current portfolio is not spread across multiple technical disciplines at this time.
CHAVCHAVADZE, COLLEEN MARGARET is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This examiner is responsible for the 1 pending office action currently on record for the company. Consequently, the prosecution strategy for the applicant is focused on the examiner's interpretation of the claims within the assigned art unit. Effective communication with CHAVCHAVADZE, COLLEEN MARGARET is critical for the advancement of the company's patent claims in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHAVCHAVADZE, COLLEEN MARGARET | 1 | 57.3% | +40.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17262505 | LIFT DRIVE FOR A RAIL-GUIDED CLIMBING SYSTEM | CHAVCHAVADZE, COLLEEN MARGARET | 34d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17262505 | LIFT DRIVE FOR A RAIL-GUIDED CLIMBING SYSTEM | CHAVCHAVADZE, COLLEEN MARGARET | 34d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3634 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17262505 | LIFT DRIVE FOR A RAIL-GUIDED CLIMBING SYSTEM | CHAVCHAVADZE, COLLEEN MARGARET | 3634 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | 34d | Pending | Jan 22, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial