Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Persivia Inc.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Persivia Inc. currently has 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This active matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The data indicates that the company's current patent prosecution is concentrated in this single technical field, with no other active matters reported.

LEWIS, CAMRYN BROOKE is the busiest examiner for the company, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. The presence of 1 distinct art unit shows that the company's e-commerce technology is being evaluated by a single specialized division. This individual handles the 1 pending office action for the portfolio.

For a practitioner, this concentration means that the prosecution strategy is focused on the 1 distinct examiner. There are no other active cases or different art units to coordinate, allowing for a direct approach. The company's immediate goals in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems are tied to the outcome of this single matter, making the interaction with the assigned examiner a primary focus.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LEWIS, CAMRYN BROOKE 1 5.0% +11.1%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18349952 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF PATIENT PRIORITIZATION SCORES AND MEASURES LEWIS, CAMRYN BROOKE —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18349952 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF PATIENT PRIORITIZATION SCORES AND MEASURES LEWIS, CAMRYN BROOKE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3683 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18349952 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF PATIENT PRIORITIZATION SCORES AND MEASURES LEWIS, CAMRYN BROOKE 3683 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 10, 2023

Managing Persivia Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month