Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Perstorp AB is active in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area with 1 pending office action. This action is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner, reflecting a concentrated prosecution focus. The presence of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's current patent activities are localized within a specific technical group at the patent office. This structure implies that the applications are being evaluated within a single specialized division.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is RAMACHANDRAN, UMAMAHESWARI, who is responsible for the 1 pending office action. With 1 busiest examiner pending action, this individual is the only examiner currently interacting with the company's filings. Practitioners should focus on the specific tendencies of this examiner, as they hold the only active matter for the company. This centralized structure within a single art unit simplifies the prosecution path, as all current results are determined by a single official's review of the pending application.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAMACHANDRAN, UMAMAHESWARI | 1 | 54.6% | +53.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17904625 | A NON-SENSITIZING ANTIMICROBIAL COMPOSITION FOR WATERBORNE COATING COMPOSITIONS | RAMACHANDRAN, UMAMAHESWARI | 16d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1627 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17904625 | A NON-SENSITIZING ANTIMICROBIAL COMPOSITION FOR WATERBORNE COATING COMPOSITIONS | RAMACHANDRAN, UMAMAHESWARI | 1627 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 16d | Pending | Aug 19, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial