Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Peter M Goodwin

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Peter M Goodwin has 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This matter is situated in 1 distinct art unit, showing a focused prosecution effort in this specific engineering field. The presence of a limited number of pending matters suggests a highly targeted approach to intellectual property, where each filing is carefully managed within its technical domain.

The portfolio involves WEAVER, SUE A, who is the distinct examiner and busiest examiner. WEAVER, SUE A is currently handling the pending office action, which accounts for the total pending volume for the applicant. Because the prosecution is limited to the current art unit, the applicant can focus their resources on the specific requirements of that group. The interaction with the examiner is a critical component of this strategy, as the outcome of the pending office action will be determined by the dialogue between the applicant and this specific official.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (100%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WEAVER, SUE A 1 62.0% +28.0%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18413709 MECHANICAL WALLET WEAVER, SUE A —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3733 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18413709 MECHANICAL WALLET WEAVER, SUE A 3733 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 16, 2024

Managing Peter M Goodwin's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Peter M Goodwin have?

Peter M Goodwin has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Peter M Goodwin applications?

Sue A Weaver has the most, with 1 of Peter M Goodwin's pending office actions.

What technology area are Peter M Goodwin's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month