Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Petroliam Nasional Berhad (Petronas)

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Computing & Software

7 pending office actions • 6 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 9 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Petroliam Nasional Berhad (Petronas) is managing 9 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are distributed among 9 distinct examiners and 8 distinct art units. This indicates a prosecution environment with technical breadth across many different specialized groups at the patent office.

GARCIA-GUERRA, DARLENE is the busiest examiner, holding 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This single action is 1 of the 9 pending office actions. The presence of 8 distinct art units for 9 actions indicates that the company's pending matters cover a range of specific chemical and material technologies. Managing 9 distinct examiners across 8 art units requires an approach to maintain consistency in prosecution. The count of 8 distinct art units relative to the total actions highlights the varied nature of the company's innovations.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (43%)
4
Medium (57%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (14%)
§103 only4 (57%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (29%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
29% of docket
3
Information Tech
43% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
14% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
14% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WALKER, AJA ARYANNA 1 57.1% +50.0%
SHINE, NICHOLAS B 1 38.6% +43.3%
BALDWIN, RANDALL KERN 1 79.6% +27.8%
BUTCHER, ROBERT T 1 71.1% +17.0%
FRANK, RODNEY T 1 72.7% +3.6%
COCCHI, MICHAEL EDWARD 1 40.9% +47.7%
LACLAIR, LOGAN EDWARD 1 78.2% +22.2%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18272525 SYSTEM, APPARATUS AND PROCESSING METHOD SUITABLE FOR PREDICTIVE BASED ANALYSIS OF A STRUCTURE SHINE, NICHOLAS B 13d
18571044 PHASE CHANGE MATERIALS WALKER, AJA ARYANNA —
17800150 EQUIPMENT FAILURE PROBABILITY CALCULATION AND LIFETIME ESTIMATION METHODS AND SYSTEMS COCCHI, MICHAEL EDWARD —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17638814 METHOD FOR SEQUESTERING CARBON LACLAIR, LOGAN EDWARD 11d overdue
18272525 SYSTEM, APPARATUS AND PROCESSING METHOD SUITABLE FOR PREDICTIVE BASED ANALYSIS OF A STRUCTURE SHINE, NICHOLAS B 13d
18571044 PHASE CHANGE MATERIALS WALKER, AJA ARYANNA —
18037504 SWEET SPOT-BASED MACHINE LEARNING (SSML) IN ASSOCIATION WITH COMPLETION-BASED MACHINE LEARNING (COMML) BALDWIN, RANDALL KERN —
18249591 BORONIC ESTERS AND COATINGS COMPRISING THEM BUTCHER, ROBERT T —
17800150 EQUIPMENT FAILURE PROBABILITY CALCULATION AND LIFETIME ESTIMATION METHODS AND SYSTEMS COCCHI, MICHAEL EDWARD —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2126 1
2125 1
1764 1
2855 1
2188 1
1736 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18571044 PHASE CHANGE MATERIALS WALKER, AJA ARYANNA — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 15, 2023
18272525 SYSTEM, APPARATUS AND PROCESSING METHOD SUITABLE FOR PREDICTIVE BASED ANALYSIS OF A STRUCTURE SHINE, NICHOLAS B 2126 §103§112 Non-Final OA 13d Pending Jul 14, 2023
18037504 SWEET SPOT-BASED MACHINE LEARNING (SSML) IN ASSOCIATION WITH COMPLETION-BASED MACHINE LEARNING (COMML) BALDWIN, RANDALL KERN 2125 §103 Final Rejection — Pending May 17, 2023
18249591 BORONIC ESTERS AND COATINGS COMPRISING THEM BUTCHER, ROBERT T 1764 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 19, 2023
18013836 PIPELINE INSPECTION SYSTEMS AND METHODS FRANK, RODNEY T 2855 §103 Final Rejection 70d Pending Dec 29, 2022
17800150 EQUIPMENT FAILURE PROBABILITY CALCULATION AND LIFETIME ESTIMATION METHODS AND SYSTEMS COCCHI, MICHAEL EDWARD 2188 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 16, 2022
17638814 METHOD FOR SEQUESTERING CARBON LACLAIR, LOGAN EDWARD 1736 §103 Final Rejection 11d overdue Pending Feb 26, 2022

Managing Petroliam Nasional Berhad (Petronas)'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month