Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Pfeiffer Vacuum Technology AG

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Pfeiffer Vacuum Technology AG currently manages 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This action is being handled by a distinct examiner, WONG, ELTON K, who holds the 1 pending action as the busiest examiner. The matter is located within a distinct art unit, representing the entire technical focus of the company's current pending applications.

With only a single pending office action and a distinct examiner, the current prosecution activity is extremely focused. There is no variance in examiners or art units to analyze, as the entire active portfolio resides with WONG, ELTON K. The technical requirements of the distinct art unit will dictate the immediate prosecution path for the company. This singular focus simplifies the monitoring of pending matters within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector. Successful prosecution depends on addressing the specific concerns of the distinct examiner assigned to the case.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WONG, ELTON K 1 78.1% +19.1%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19410348 PUMP SYSTEM WITH ELECTRICALLY OPERATED COOLING DEVICE WONG, ELTON K —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19410348 PUMP SYSTEM WITH ELECTRICALLY OPERATED COOLING DEVICE WONG, ELTON K —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3745 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19410348 PUMP SYSTEM WITH ELECTRICALLY OPERATED COOLING DEVICE WONG, ELTON K 3745 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 05, 2025

Managing Pfeiffer Vacuum Technology AG's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month