Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 21 patents granted in the last 365 days
Pgytech Co. Ltd. has 2 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. Both of these actions are assigned to 1 distinct examiner. The prosecution is centralized within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a very focused technical area for the company's current applications. This concentration means the entire pending portfolio is subject to the review of a single individual.
MAI, TRI M is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, managing both of the 2 pending office actions. As the only examiner involved, MAI, TRI M is responsible for the entirety of the company's current pending matters. These 2 pending office actions represent the total active workload for the organization, ensuring that no other examiners are currently reviewing the company's applications.
The concentration in 1 distinct art unit and the involvement of only 1 distinct examiner means the company's prosecution strategy is focused on a single individual's review. MAI, TRI M's oversight of the 2 pending office actions is the sole focus of the company's pending activity. These 2 pending office actions are the only ones of the 2 total pending office actions currently active, providing a streamlined prosecution environment.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAI, TRI M | 2 | 36.2% | +20.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19017164 | Trolley Bag | MAI, TRI M | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18898462 | Assembly Structure for Suitcase | MAI, TRI M | 56d |
| 19017164 | Trolley Bag | MAI, TRI M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3733 | 2 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19017164 | Trolley Bag | MAI, TRI M | 3733 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jan 10, 2025 |
| 18898462 | Assembly Structure for Suitcase | MAI, TRI M | 3733 | §103 | Final Rejection | 56d | Pending | Sep 26, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialPgytech Co. Ltd. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Tri M Mai has the most, with 2 of Pgytech Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
