Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Phagenesis Limited

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Phagenesis Limited has 3 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These are distributed across 3 distinct examiners and a matching number of distinct art units. This distribution shows that each of the 3 pending office actions is being reviewed by a different examiner in a different art unit, suggesting a broad technical range for the company's current filings.

KAHELIN, MICHAEL WILLIAM is the busiest examiner, managing 1 pending office action. This indicates that the workload is split evenly, with no single examiner handling more than one matter. For the practitioner, this decentralized structure means that prosecution strategies must be tailored to the specific tendencies of each individual examiner and art unit involved. The lack of concentration suggests that the outcomes of these actions are likely to be independent of one another, requiring a multi-faceted approach to portfolio management.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
2
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (67%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KAHELIN, MICHAEL WILLIAM 1 77.9% +23.9%
PORTER, JR, GARY A 1 68.8% +25.2%
BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID 1 34.0% +33.2%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18253519 DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR TREATING DISEASE USING ELECTRICAL STIMULATION PORTER, JR, GARY A 70d

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18253519 DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR TREATING DISEASE USING ELECTRICAL STIMULATION PORTER, JR, GARY A 70d
18463061 DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR TREATING DISEASE USING ELECTRICAL STIMULATION KAHELIN, MICHAEL WILLIAM —
17658035 PHARYNGEAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3792 1
3796 1
3700 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18463061 DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR TREATING DISEASE USING ELECTRICAL STIMULATION KAHELIN, MICHAEL WILLIAM 3792 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 07, 2023
18253519 DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR TREATING DISEASE USING ELECTRICAL STIMULATION PORTER, JR, GARY A 3796 §102§103 Final Rejection 70d Pending May 18, 2023
17658035 PHARYNGEAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID 3700 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 05, 2022

Managing Phagenesis Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month