Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Pharrowtech BV currently manages a focused patent portfolio within the Communications technology area. The data shows 1 pending office action, which represents the entirety of the company's current active engagement with the patent office. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, indicating a concentrated prosecution strategy at this stage. Because there is only 1 distinct art unit involved, the portfolio's technical focus remains narrow within its field.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is GENACK, MATTHEW W, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This individual handles the current workload for Pharrowtech BV, meaning the outcome of the portfolio's immediate prosecution rests with the interpretation of this examiner. For a practitioner, this concentration suggests that understanding the specific preferences and past decisions of this 1 examiner is a primary factor in navigating the current pending matters. The alignment of 1 distinct examiner with 1 distinct art unit further confirms that the legal challenges are confined to a specific regulatory environment.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GENACK, MATTHEW W | 1 | 64.7% | +21.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18508002 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR WIRELESS SYSTEMS WITH MULTIPLE RADIO FRONT ENDS | GENACK, MATTHEW W | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18508002 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR WIRELESS SYSTEMS WITH MULTIPLE RADIO FRONT ENDS | GENACK, MATTHEW W | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2645 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18508002 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR WIRELESS SYSTEMS WITH MULTIPLE RADIO FRONT ENDS | GENACK, MATTHEW W | 2645 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 13, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialPharrowtech BV has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Matthew W Genack has the most, with 1 of Pharrowtech BV's pending office actions.
Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
