Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Phenox GmbH

4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
4
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (75%)
§102 only1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
25% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
75% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PROCTOR, CACHET I 1 77.1% +5.8%
PATEL, AREN 1 78.8% +17.5%
HU, ANN M 1 67.7% +21.0%
PASQUALINI, HANNA LOUISE 1 40.0% +33.3%

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18009817 Insertion System for Implants for Treatment of Bifurcation Aneurysms HU, ANN M 19d overdue
18274344 Coated Medical Devices PATEL, AREN 9d
18009327 Implant For Treating Aneurysms PASQUALINI, HANNA LOUISE 61d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3774 3
1712 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18275494 Coated Medical Product and Method for Coating a Medical Product PROCTOR, CACHET I 1712 §103 Non-Final OA 14d Pending Aug 02, 2023
18274344 Coated Medical Devices PATEL, AREN 3774 §103 Non-Final OA 9d Pending Jul 26, 2023
18009817 Insertion System for Implants for Treatment of Bifurcation Aneurysms HU, ANN M 3774 §102 Final Rejection 19d overdue Pending Dec 12, 2022
18009327 Implant For Treating Aneurysms PASQUALINI, HANNA LOUISE 3774 §103 Final Rejection 61d Pending Dec 08, 2022

Managing Phenox GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month