Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Pi-Xcels Co. Ltd. is currently managing 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct art unit and involves 1 distinct examiner. This indicates a very focused current prosecution effort. With 1 pending office action, the company is concentrating its intellectual property resources on a specific technical advancement within the transportation sector.
IMMANUEL, ILSE I is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 pending office action. This examiner handles the entirety of the company's active docket at the patent office. The progress of the company's intellectual property depends on the specific examination of this single official. Because the busiest examiner pending count is 1, the company's current patent strategy is entirely dependent on the review of this one examiner. The concentration within 1 distinct art unit and 1 distinct examiner means that the company can focus its advocacy on the specific requirements and interpretations of this individual.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| IMMANUEL, ILSE I | 1 | 27.2% | +27.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18752970 | METHOD OF ISSUING ELECTRONIC RECEIPTS | IMMANUEL, ILSE I | 45d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18752970 | METHOD OF ISSUING ELECTRONIC RECEIPTS | IMMANUEL, ILSE I | 45d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3699 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18752970 | METHOD OF ISSUING ELECTRONIC RECEIPTS | IMMANUEL, ILSE I | 3699 | §101§102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 45d overdue | Pending | Jun 25, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial