Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Pickletown Creative LLC

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Pickletown Creative LLC currently manages 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This single active matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner working within 1 distinct art unit. The concentration of work suggests a highly focused prosecution effort rather than a broad, multi-front strategy across different USPTO divisions.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is MACCRATE, NICOLE PAIGE, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Because this is the only active matter, this examiner handles the entirety of the company's current workload. Practitioners should note that the prosecution experience is centralized, meaning the outcomes of this specific interaction will define the current success rate for the portfolio.

With only 1 distinct art unit involved, the legal team can focus its technical arguments on the specific standards and precedents of that unit. The presence of 1 distinct examiner means that the relationship and communication style established with MACCRATE, NICOLE PAIGE will be the primary factor in resolving the current active matter. This streamlined profile indicates a portfolio in a very specific stage of development.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MACCRATE, NICOLE PAIGE 1 56.8% +22.4%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18414492 Floral Design Devices And Systems MACCRATE, NICOLE PAIGE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3642 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18414492 Floral Design Devices And Systems MACCRATE, NICOLE PAIGE 3642 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 17, 2024

Managing Pickletown Creative LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month