Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Pied Parker Inc. is managing 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 2 actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners. The prosecution is concentrated within 1 distinct art unit. This situation may lead to different interpretations of the same art unit's standards by the 2 distinct examiners involved.
VETTER, DANIEL is the busiest examiner, responsible for 1 pending action. With 2 pending office actions and 2 distinct examiners, the company must address the perspectives of 2 different individuals within the same 1 distinct art unit. Practitioners should coordinate responses to the 2 distinct examiners to maintain consistency across the 2 pending office actions. The 1 pending action per examiner distribution means that each of the 2 pending office actions is being handled independently. Managing 2 pending office actions within 1 distinct art unit requires a strategy that accounts for the specific tendencies of both examiners.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| VETTER, DANIEL | 1 | 20.3% | +8.9% |
| MOORE, DUANE NEIL | 1 | 26.9% | +13.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18717934 | SYSTEMS AND TECHNIQUES FOR DYNAMIC MOBILE MANAGEMENT USING COMPUTER VISION AND NAVIGATION SENSORS | MOORE, DUANE NEIL | 22d overdue |
| 19228620 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SECURE ACCESS CONTROL | VETTER, DANIEL | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18717934 | SYSTEMS AND TECHNIQUES FOR DYNAMIC MOBILE MANAGEMENT USING COMPUTER VISION AND NAVIGATION SENSORS | MOORE, DUANE NEIL | 22d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3628 | 2 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19228620 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SECURE ACCESS CONTROL | VETTER, DANIEL | 3628 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 04, 2025 |
| 18717934 | SYSTEMS AND TECHNIQUES FOR DYNAMIC MOBILE MANAGEMENT USING COMPUTER VISION AND NAVIGATION SENSORS | MOORE, DUANE NEIL | 3628 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 22d overdue | Pending | Jun 07, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialPied Parker Inc. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 2 examiners.
Daniel Vetter has the most, with 1 of Pied Parker Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
