Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Pin Genie Inc. has 1 pending office action in the technology area of Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. This action is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner, TULLIA, STEVEN A. The portfolio's active matters are currently limited to 1 distinct art unit. TULLIA, STEVEN A is the busiest examiner, holding 1 busiest examiner pending action.
The 1 pending office action is the only active prosecution matter for the company at this time. With 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the prosecution effort is centralized. The 1 busiest examiner pending action assigned to TULLIA, STEVEN A accounts for the entire current workload of 1 pending office action.
Practitioners should note that the 1 distinct art unit within Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems indicates a specific technical focus. The 1 distinct examiner model means that the success of the 1 pending office action depends on the feedback from TULLIA, STEVEN A. This profile allows for a direct and singular prosecution strategy.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TULLIA, STEVEN A | 1 | 74.3% | +19.2% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18673558 | Electric Door Lock Device | TULLIA, STEVEN A | 92d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3675 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18673558 | Electric Door Lock Device | TULLIA, STEVEN A | 3675 | §103 | Final Rejection | 92d overdue | Pending | May 24, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial