Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Pinnacle 20 LLC has 1 pending office action in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. This action is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner, centralizing the current prosecution activity for the company. The pending matter is located within 1 distinct art unit, which points to a specific technical focus within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics sector.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is DZIERZYNSKI, EVAN P, who is assigned 1 pending office action. As the total number of pending office actions is 1, this examiner is responsible for the company's current pending work. This relationship between the 1 action and the 1 examiner simplifies the management of the portfolio. Practitioners should focus on the specific precedents and preferences of DZIERZYNSKI, EVAN P within the 1 distinct art unit to address the 1 pending office action.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DZIERZYNSKI, EVAN P | 1 | 77.5% | +12.2% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19322305 | MODULAR LIGHTING SYSTEM ASSEMBLY | DZIERZYNSKI, EVAN P | 8d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2875 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19322305 | MODULAR LIGHTING SYSTEM ASSEMBLY | DZIERZYNSKI, EVAN P | 2875 | §103 | Final Rejection | 8d overdue | Pending | Sep 08, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial