Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Pittway Sarl

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

7 pending office actions • 5 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Pittway Sarl is currently navigating 7 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The distribution of these matters is highly decentralized, as the 7 pending actions are assigned to 7 distinct examiners. This arrangement ensures that the outcome of the portfolio is not overly dependent on the discretion of a single examiner, as each pending matter is being reviewed by a different individual. Practitioners should prepare for 7 independent prosecution tracks that may not share a common examiner perspective.

The portfolio's reach extends across 5 distinct art units, indicating a diverse range of technical classifications for its pending applications. While the number of examiners is 7, the lower count of 5 art units suggests that multiple examiners are operating within the same specialized groups. Legal teams should monitor whether these art units share common internal policies that might affect prosecution across different applications. This overlap provides a small opportunity for cross-application consistency within an otherwise fragmented portfolio.

WADDY, JONATHAN J is designated as the busiest examiner for this company, yet this individual holds only 1 pending office action. This figure represents a minimal concentration of work, as the busiest examiner handles the same volume as every other examiner involved in the portfolio. The lack of a dominant examiner suggests a balanced prosecution environment where no single person controls a significant portion of the company's active patent pipeline. Strategy should focus on the distinct individuals rather than a central point of contact.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (43%)
4
Medium (57%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (29%)
§102 only2 (29%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (43%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
14% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
14% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
71% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WADDY, JONATHAN J 1 71.8% +36.6%
GRAY, PAUL J 1 78.5% +10.7%
CHAUDRY, ATIF H 1 70.8% +16.5%
ABDULLAHI, SELMAN MOHAMED 1 — —
SHIRSAT, VIVEK K 1 74.3% +27.9%
OLAMIT, JUSTIN N 1 62.1% +9.5%
PEREIRO, JORGE ANDRES 1 63.8% +20.6%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18866368 GAS-FLOW ADJUSTMENT DEVICE FOR A GAS BURNER APPLIANCE AND GAS BURNER APPLIANCE CHAUDRY, ATIF H 45d overdue
18553060 Separating Pressure Transducer for Measuring Pressure in a Polluted Environment OLAMIT, JUSTIN N 37d overdue
19109465 Systems and Methods for Measuring Throttle Position WADDY, JONATHAN J —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18548666 PARTIALLY-PREMIXED GAS BURNER APPLIANCE PEREIRO, JORGE ANDRES 46d overdue
18866368 GAS-FLOW ADJUSTMENT DEVICE FOR A GAS BURNER APPLIANCE AND GAS BURNER APPLIANCE CHAUDRY, ATIF H 45d overdue
18873150 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ERROR COMPENSATION IN PULSE-WIDTH MODULATED SYSTEMS GRAY, PAUL J 47d
19109465 Systems and Methods for Measuring Throttle Position WADDY, JONATHAN J —
18702868 METHOD FOR PRESSURE MONITORING A PRESSURE-DEPENDENT PROCESS AND PRESSURE SENSOR SHIRSAT, VIVEK K —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3753 3
2199 1
3762 1
2853 1
3799 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19109465 Systems and Methods for Measuring Throttle Position WADDY, JONATHAN J 3753 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 06, 2025
18873150 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ERROR COMPENSATION IN PULSE-WIDTH MODULATED SYSTEMS GRAY, PAUL J 3753 §102 Non-Final OA 47d Pending Dec 09, 2024
18866368 GAS-FLOW ADJUSTMENT DEVICE FOR A GAS BURNER APPLIANCE AND GAS BURNER APPLIANCE CHAUDRY, ATIF H 3753 §102§103 Final Rejection 45d overdue Pending Nov 15, 2024
18833662 SYSTEMS CONFIGURED WITH A NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS ARCHITECTURE FOR ELECTRONIC MESSAGING AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF ABDULLAHI, SELMAN MOHAMED 2199 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 26, 2024
18702868 METHOD FOR PRESSURE MONITORING A PRESSURE-DEPENDENT PROCESS AND PRESSURE SENSOR SHIRSAT, VIVEK K 3762 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 19, 2024
18553060 Separating Pressure Transducer for Measuring Pressure in a Polluted Environment OLAMIT, JUSTIN N 2853 §102§103 Non-Final OA 37d overdue Pending Sep 28, 2023
18548666 PARTIALLY-PREMIXED GAS BURNER APPLIANCE PEREIRO, JORGE ANDRES 3799 §103 Final Rejection 46d overdue Pending Sep 01, 2023

Managing Pittway Sarl's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Pittway Sarl have?

Pittway Sarl has 7 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 5 art units and 7 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Pittway Sarl applications?

Jonathan J Waddy has the most, with 1 of Pittway Sarl's pending office actions.

What technology area are Pittway Sarl's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month