Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Plantics Holding B V is active in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The company currently has 2 pending office actions. These actions are split between 2 distinct examiners, meaning no single examiner is handling more than one case. SHAH, SAMIR is the busiest examiner for the company, with a total of 1 pending office action.
The prosecution is spread across 2 distinct art units, which corresponds to the 2 distinct examiners involved. This distribution indicates that the company's 2 pending office actions are being processed in different technical or administrative environments. Managing these matters requires addressing the specific requirements of 2 separate art units. The lack of concentration, with only 1 pending action per examiner, suggests a diverse but small-scale prosecution effort within the chemistry field.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (67%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| COONEY, JOHN M | 1 | 62.8% | +21.1% |
| SHAH, SAMIR | 1 | 36.4% | +34.9% |
| MACHNESS, ARIELLA | 1 | 61.9% | +28.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17756335 | COMPOSITION SUITABLE FOR 3D PRINTING | MACHNESS, ARIELLA | 8d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18479212 | PANEL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THEREOF | SHAH, SAMIR | 9d overdue |
| 17756335 | COMPOSITION SUITABLE FOR 3D PRINTING | MACHNESS, ARIELLA | 8d |
| 18560877 | PROCESS FOR MANUFACTURING A THERMOSET POLYMER FOAM AND POLYMER FOAM | COONEY, JOHN M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1787 | 1 |
| 1743 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18560877 | PROCESS FOR MANUFACTURING A THERMOSET POLYMER FOAM AND POLYMER FOAM | COONEY, JOHN M | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 14, 2023 |
| 18479212 | PANEL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THEREOF | SHAH, SAMIR | 1787 | §103 | Final Rejection | 9d overdue | Pending | Oct 02, 2023 |
| 17756335 | COMPOSITION SUITABLE FOR 3D PRINTING | MACHNESS, ARIELLA | 1743 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 8d | Pending | May 23, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial