Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Plumettaz Holding SA has 1 pending office action. This case is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, LEE D WILSON. The data shows 0 distinct art units. LEE D WILSON is the busiest examiner, managing 1 pending office action.
With 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner, the prosecution is centralized. The 0 distinct art units is the administrative figure for this profile. Because there is only 1 pending office action, the entire portfolio's current progress depends on this 1 distinct examiner.
The absence of a recorded technology area or art unit count of 0 limits the ability to categorize the specific technical focus of this pending matter. Practitioners should note the 1 distinct examiner for this single action. This single pending office action represents the entirety of the company's current active prosecution footprint.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WILSON, LEE D | 1 | 80.0% | +18.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18854515 | DEVICE FOR LAYING A CABLE INTO A DUCT WITH A LUBRICATING CAPACITY | WILSON, LEE D | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18854515 | DEVICE FOR LAYING A CABLE INTO A DUCT WITH A LUBRICATING CAPACITY | WILSON, LEE D | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18854515 | DEVICE FOR LAYING A CABLE INTO A DUCT WITH A LUBRICATING CAPACITY | WILSON, LEE D | — | §102§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 04, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial