Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Posco Future M Co. Ltd.

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Posco Future M Co. Ltd. currently manages 4 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The distribution of these actions is spread across 4 distinct examiners and an equal number of distinct art units. This distribution of actions and examiners suggests a diverse set of filings rather than a concentrated push in a single niche. The lack of overlap between art units indicates that each pending matter likely addresses a different technical sub-field within the broader chemistry category.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is WOLFORD, KURT JOSEPH, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Because the busiest examiner only handles a portion of the pending actions, the prosecution workload is distributed across the legal staff. Practitioners should prepare for varied examiner behaviors and differing procedural norms across the different art units involved in these proceedings. The absence of examiner concentration means that no single individual's decision-making style will dominate the outcome of the current pending portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (25%)
3
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (75%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
75% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
25% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WOLFORD, KURT JOSEPH 1 74.8% +28.5%
WHITE, SADIE 1 48.8% +31.6%
ZHANG, HAIXIA 1 62.9% +17.8%
CARVALHO JR., ARMINDO 1 50.3% +29.0%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18717018 APPARATUS FOR FIRING CATHODE MATERIAL OF SECONDARY BATTERY WOLFORD, KURT JOSEPH —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17787737 METHOD FOR PREPARING SECONDARY BATTERY CATHODE MATERIAL ZHANG, HAIXIA 9d overdue
18037267 NEGATIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY, METHOD FOR PREPARING SAME, AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY COMPRISING NEGATIVE ELECTRODE MANUFACTURED USING SAME WHITE, SADIE 21d
17787006 CATHODE ACTIVE MATERIAL AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY COMPRISING SAME CARVALHO JR., ARMINDO 30d
18717018 APPARATUS FOR FIRING CATHODE MATERIAL OF SECONDARY BATTERY WOLFORD, KURT JOSEPH —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3762 1
1721 1
1723 1
1729 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18717018 APPARATUS FOR FIRING CATHODE MATERIAL OF SECONDARY BATTERY WOLFORD, KURT JOSEPH 3762 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 06, 2024
18037267 NEGATIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY, METHOD FOR PREPARING SAME, AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY COMPRISING NEGATIVE ELECTRODE MANUFACTURED USING SAME WHITE, SADIE 1721 §103 Non-Final OA 21d Pending May 16, 2023
17787737 METHOD FOR PREPARING SECONDARY BATTERY CATHODE MATERIAL ZHANG, HAIXIA 1723 §103 Final Rejection 9d overdue Pending Jun 21, 2022
17787006 CATHODE ACTIVE MATERIAL AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY COMPRISING SAME CARVALHO JR., ARMINDO 1729 §103 Non-Final OA 30d Pending Jun 17, 2022

Managing Posco Future M Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month