Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Postech currently has 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This prosecution activity is handled by a distinct examiner and is located within a distinct art unit. The scope of current activity indicates a specific technical focus for the company's pending intellectual property. By operating within a distinct art unit, the company can focus on the specific examination guidelines relevant to that chemistry-related group. This focus helps in tailoring the arguments for the pending office action.
BOOTH, ALEXANDER D is the busiest examiner for Postech, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. The data shows that the current prosecution phase involves this examiner in this art unit. For the applicant, this means that the relationship with BOOTH, ALEXANDER D is the primary factor in the current prosecution cycle. Having a distinct examiner involved defines the administrative tracking and communication requirements for the company's active patent matters.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BOOTH, ALEXANDER D | 1 | 54.4% | +37.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18569686 | Meta surface manufacturing apparatus, manufacturing method and meta surface using nanocomposite | BOOTH, ALEXANDER D | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1749 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18569686 | Meta surface manufacturing apparatus, manufacturing method and meta surface using nanocomposite | BOOTH, ALEXANDER D | 1749 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 26, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial