Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Powerslide GmbH

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Powerslide GmbH has 2 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners but are concentrated within 1 distinct art unit. The busiest examiner is WALTERS, JOHN DANIEL, who holds 1 pending action.

The presence of 2 pending actions across 2 examiners within 1 art unit indicates that while the technical focus is narrow, the prosecution is being handled by different individuals. This may lead to different examination styles within the same technical group. With 2 pending actions total, the portfolio's current activity is technically unified but personnel-diverse. Practitioners should coordinate arguments to ensure consistency within the 1 art unit while adapting to the 2 examiners. This structure provides a stable technical environment for the 2 pending matters currently under review and allows for a specialized approach to the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering field.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
1
Business / Other
50% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WALTERS, JOHN DANIEL 1 80.4% +5.9%
LYNCH, PATRICK JOHN 1 61.1% +41.6%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18924985 SHOE FASTENING SYSTEM WALTERS, JOHN DANIEL —
18776247 SPORTS SHOE LYNCH, PATRICK JOHN —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18776247 SPORTS SHOE LYNCH, PATRICK JOHN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3732 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18924985 SHOE FASTENING SYSTEM WALTERS, JOHN DANIEL — §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 23, 2024
18776247 SPORTS SHOE LYNCH, PATRICK JOHN 3732 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 17, 2024

Managing Powerslide GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month