Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Prestone Products Corporation has 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This prosecution activity involves 1 distinct examiner and is located in 1 distinct art unit. This indicates that the company's current patenting efforts are focused on a specific chemical or material innovation. The presence of 1 distinct art unit means the company is not facing the challenge of navigating different procedural requirements across multiple units.
DIGGS, TANISHA is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently handling 1 pending office action. As the sole examiner engaged with the company's pending work, Diggs's individual approach to examination will be a factor in the prosecution's success. The fact that the 1 pending office action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner allows for a highly specialized prosecution strategy. This streamlined structure reduces the administrative complexity of the company's intellectual property efforts.
For practitioners, the 1 pending office action requires a targeted response that addresses the specific technical issues raised by the examiner. With 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the company can maintain a focused prosecution strategy. This allows for a deep dive into the specific requirements of the Chemistry & Materials field as they apply to this single pending application. Resolving the 1 pending office action efficiently will be the primary goal for this material science portfolio.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DIGGS, TANISHA | 1 | 55.1% | +53.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18086092 | Heat Transfer Fluids Containing Synergistic Blends of Corrosion Inhibitor Formulations | DIGGS, TANISHA | 28d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18086092 | Heat Transfer Fluids Containing Synergistic Blends of Corrosion Inhibitor Formulations | DIGGS, TANISHA | 28d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1761 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18086092 | Heat Transfer Fluids Containing Synergistic Blends of Corrosion Inhibitor Formulations | DIGGS, TANISHA | 1761 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | 28d | Pending | Dec 21, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial