Technology areas: Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
14 pending office actions • 10 art units • 13 examiners • 0 of 14 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 22 patents granted in the last 365 days
Procore Technologies Inc. has 14 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. The docket covers 13 distinct examiners and 10 distinct art units, showing broad examiner distribution across a smaller set of examination units. That structure supports organizing prosecution review by art unit while preserving examiner-specific response records.
YESILDAG, LAURA G is the busiest listed examiner, with 2 pending matters. No examiner accounts for a large share of the docket, so counsel should not assume that one recurring examination approach governs the portfolio. Coordination across the separate assignments remains important for maintaining consistent claim positions.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 3 (21%) |
| §101 + other | 6 (43%) |
| §103 only | 2 (14%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 3 (21%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| YESILDAG, LAURA G | 2 | 34.7% | +41.9% |
| CHBOUKI, TAREK | 1 | 81.3% | +23.8% |
| RUIZ, ANGELICA | 1 | 83.3% | +14.4% |
| MAZUMDER, SAPTARSHI | 1 | 65.0% | +11.4% |
| OBAID, HAMZEH M | 1 | 37.9% | +21.8% |
| GARCIA-GUERRA, DARLENE | 1 | 23.2% | +34.4% |
| WAESCO, JOSEPH M | 1 | 46.7% | +42.1% |
| GILLS, KURTIS | 1 | 58.0% | +28.8% |
| HENRY, MATTHEW D | 1 | 29.7% | +19.7% |
| TAN, DAVID H | 1 | 32.1% | +16.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19334172 | Metadata-Based Recommendations of File Names | RUIZ, ANGELICA | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18662404 | Machine-Learning-Based Prediction of Construction Project Parameters | HENRY, MATTHEW D | 50d overdue |
| 18961564 | Determination of Insights for Construction Projects | OBAID, HAMZEH M | 29d overdue |
| 18297122 | Computer System and Method for Construction Project Prequalification and Management | YESILDAG, LAURA G | 34d |
| 19383274 | Data Distribution and Access within a Multi-Zone Computing Platform | CHBOUKI, TAREK | — |
| 19006612 | Computer System and Method for Managing Coordination Issues in Construction Projects | MAZUMDER, SAPTARSHI | — |
| 18952795 | Computing System And Method For Generating Intelligent Construction Project Schedules | GARCIA-GUERRA, DARLENE | — |
| 18952908 | Intelligent Linking of Submittal and Schedule Objects Within a Construction Management Software Application | WAESCO, JOSEPH M | — |
| 18914455 | Computer System and Method for Tracking the Impact of a Change Event | GILLS, KURTIS | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18662404 | Machine-Learning-Based Prediction of Construction Project Parameters | HENRY, MATTHEW D | 50d overdue |
| 18961564 | Determination of Insights for Construction Projects | OBAID, HAMZEH M | 29d overdue |
| 18297122 | Computer System and Method for Construction Project Prequalification and Management | YESILDAG, LAURA G | 34d |
| 19383274 | Data Distribution and Access within a Multi-Zone Computing Platform | CHBOUKI, TAREK | — |
| 19334172 | Metadata-Based Recommendations of File Names | RUIZ, ANGELICA | — |
| 19006612 | Computer System and Method for Managing Coordination Issues in Construction Projects | MAZUMDER, SAPTARSHI | — |
| 18952795 | Computing System And Method For Generating Intelligent Construction Project Schedules | GARCIA-GUERRA, DARLENE | — |
| 18952908 | Intelligent Linking of Submittal and Schedule Objects Within a Construction Management Software Application | WAESCO, JOSEPH M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3625 | 3 |
| 3624 | 2 |
| 3626 | 2 |
| 2165 | 1 |
| 2154 | 1 |
| 2612 | 1 |
| 2145 | 1 |
| 2647 | 1 |
| 3629 | 1 |
| 3600 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19383274 | Data Distribution and Access within a Multi-Zone Computing Platform | CHBOUKI, TAREK | 2165 | §102§103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 07, 2025 |
| 19334172 | Metadata-Based Recommendations of File Names | RUIZ, ANGELICA | 2154 | §103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 19, 2025 |
| 19006612 | Computer System and Method for Managing Coordination Issues in Construction Projects | MAZUMDER, SAPTARSHI | 2612 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 31, 2024 |
| 18961564 | Determination of Insights for Construction Projects | OBAID, HAMZEH M | 3624 | §101§102 | Final Rejection | 29d overdue | Pending | Nov 27, 2024 |
| 18952795 | Computing System And Method For Generating Intelligent Construction Project Schedules | GARCIA-GUERRA, DARLENE | 3625 | §101 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Nov 19, 2024 |
| 18952908 | Intelligent Linking of Submittal and Schedule Objects Within a Construction Management Software Application | WAESCO, JOSEPH M | 3625 | §101§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Nov 19, 2024 |
| 18914455 | Computer System and Method for Tracking the Impact of a Change Event | GILLS, KURTIS | 3624 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Oct 14, 2024 |
| 18662404 | Machine-Learning-Based Prediction of Construction Project Parameters | HENRY, MATTHEW D | 3625 | §101§112DP | Non-Final OA | 50d overdue | Pending | May 13, 2024 |
| 18399124 | Creating, Assigning, and Interacting with Action Items Related to Collaborative Tasks | TAN, DAVID H | 2145 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 28, 2023 |
| 18535918 | Drawing Matching Tool | TORRES, MARCOS L | 2647 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 11, 2023 |
| 18535608 | Computer System and Method for Mirroring Data Across Different Accounts of a Software as a Service (SaaS) Application | RIVERA GONZALEZ, IVONNEMARY | 3626 | §101§103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 11, 2023 |
| 18345960 | Dynamic Logic Generator for Incongruous Information in Construction Project Planning Applications | SCHNEIDER, JOSHUA D | 3626 | §101§103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jun 30, 2023 |
| 18297122 | Computer System and Method for Construction Project Prequalification and Management | YESILDAG, LAURA G | 3629 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 34d | Pending | Apr 07, 2023 |
| 18193627 | Connected Configurations Across Collaborator Accounts | YESILDAG, LAURA G | 3600 | §101 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Mar 30, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialProcore Technologies Inc. has 14 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 10 art units and 13 examiners.
Laura G Yesildag has the most, with 2 of Procore Technologies Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
