Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Production Technologies Australia Pty Ltd. currently maintains 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, CRAIG, DANIEL THOMAS. The prosecution is confined to 1 distinct art unit, indicating a singular technical focus for the current portfolio. This streamlined structure simplifies the management of the company's intellectual property within this specific sector.
CRAIG, DANIEL THOMAS serves as the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. This single action represents the total pending workload for the company. Because there is only 1 distinct art unit and 1 distinct examiner, the prosecution process is highly concentrated. This allows the applicant to focus their resources on the specific requirements of the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area. Practitioners can expect a direct and consistent interaction with the patent office for this pending matter.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRAIG, DANIEL THOMAS | 1 | 84.8% | +25.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18728247 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CLEARING SOLIDS FROM A WELL | CRAIG, DANIEL THOMAS | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18728247 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CLEARING SOLIDS FROM A WELL | CRAIG, DANIEL THOMAS | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3676 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18728247 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CLEARING SOLIDS FROM A WELL | CRAIG, DANIEL THOMAS | 3676 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 11, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialProduction Technologies Australia Pty Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Daniel Thomas Craig has the most, with 1 of Production Technologies Australia Pty Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
